To determine which system is more cost-effective in the long run, we need to consider the total costs associated with different production technologies and how they change in response to variable input costs, such as labor and machinery.
Production Technologies Comparison
Let’s look at an example where three production technologies are used:
- Technology 1: Heavy on labor, light on machines (e.g., 10 workers, 2 machines).
- Technology 2: Moderate labor, moderate machines (e.g., 7 workers, 4 machines).
- Technology 3: Light on labor, heavy on machines (e.g., 3 workers, 7 machines).
Cost Effectiveness Analysis
- When Labor Costs Are Low: Technology 1 tends to be more cost-effective if labor costs are significantly low compared to machinery costs.
- When Labor Costs Rise: As labor costs increase, technologies that substitute machines for workers become more cost-effective. For example, if labor costs rise to high levels, Technology 3 becomes more cost-effective.
- Long-Run Considerations: In the long run, firms can adjust all inputs, including capital and labor. Therefore, the choice of technology depends on the relative costs of these inputs and the firm’s ability to minimize its Long-Run Average Cost (LRAC).
Conclusion
The most cost-effective system in the long run depends on the relative costs of labor and machinery. If labor costs are high, technologies that use more machinery and less labor (like Technology 3) are more cost-effective. Conversely, if labor costs are low, technologies with more labor and less machinery might be preferred. The key is to minimize LRAC by choosing the production technology that best matches the current input prices.
Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/which-system-is-more-cost-effective-in-the-long-run/
