How does the licensing process impact the timeline of PSH facility construction

How does the licensing process impact the timeline of PSH facility construction

The licensing process significantly impacts pumped storage hydropower (PSH) project timelines due to procedural complexity, variability in approval pathways, and post-licensing requirements:

Licensing Phases and Delays

  • Pre-filing consultations (6 months–2+ years): Projects like Swan Lake (P-13318) spent ~3 years in early-stage consultations before submitting final applications.
  • Study disputes and information gathering: Mandatory environmental studies and interagency disputes often extend timelines, particularly under the Traditional Licensing Process (TLP) where FERC involvement is limited post-filing.
  • NEPA compliance: Environmental review scoping and documentation add 1–3 years, depending on whether projects use the Integrated Licensing Process (ILP) (collaborative pre-filing) or TLP (post-filing reviews).

Process Variability

  • Expedited pathways: FERC’s 2020 reforms aim to cap closed-loop PSH licensing at two years post-application, but historical data shows actual durations ranging from 3.6–8.9 years from Notice of Intent (NOI) to license issuance.
  • Process type comparison:
    • ILP: Collaborative pre-filing, FERC-approved study plans, and pre-emptive dispute resolution theoretically shorten timelines but still face delays (e.g., Eagle Mountain: 6.4 years NOI-to-license).
    • TLP: Post-filing reviews and limited FERC oversight often prolong timelines due to conflicting agency requirements.

Post-Licensing Hurdles

  • Construction deadlines: All recently licensed PSH projects requested FERC deadline extensions beyond the standard two-year construction start window.
  • Additional permits: Projects must secure state water rights, land-use permits, and environmental clearances post-FERC licensing, adding 1–5 years.

Project-Specific Timelines

Project (FERC ID) Process Type NOI to License Issuance Construction Status
Eagle Mountain (P-13123) ILP 6.4 years Pre-construction, multiple extensions
Gordon Butte (P-13642) ALP 3.6 years Pre-construction, extended deadline
Swan Lake (P-13318) ILP 8.9 years Pre-construction pending permits

FERC’s recent reforms aim to streamline closed-loop PSH licensing, but persistent delays stem from study disputes, NEPA reviews, and post-license permitting.

Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-does-the-licensing-process-impact-the-timeline-of-psh-facility-construction/

Like (0)
NenPowerNenPower
Previous November 27, 2024 10:18 pm
Next November 27, 2024 11:18 pm

相关推荐