Liquid air energy storage (LAES) and lithium-ion batteries differ significantly in efficiency and cost-effectiveness for grid-scale applications.
Efficiency Comparisons
- Standalone LAES: Achieves up to 57% efficiency in basic configurations. Advanced hybrid systems (e.g., incorporating oxy-fuel combustion and waste heat recovery) report round-trip efficiency improvements of ~56.7% over conventional designs, enabling simultaneous power, heating, and cooling outputs.
- Lithium-ion batteries: Typically operate at 85–95% round-trip efficiency under real-world conditions, though this varies with cycle depth and temperature.
Cost Considerations
LAES demonstrates a levelized cost of storage (LCOS) of $60/MWh, approximately one-third that of lithium-ion batteries. This cost advantage stems from LAES’s ability to leverage low-grade waste heat, scale without rare materials, and integrate multi-output functionalities (e.g., heating/cooling).
Trade-offs
While lithium-ion excels in rapid response and efficiency, LAES offers longer storage durations, lower environmental footprint, and co-generation capabilities. MIT researchers emphasize LAES’s potential as a low-cost backbone for decarbonized grids, particularly in regions requiring seasonal or multi-day energy balancing.
For grid operators prioritizing cost over speed, LAES presents a compelling alternative despite its efficiency gap.
Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-does-the-efficiency-of-liquid-air-energy-storage-compare-to-lithium-ion-batteries/
