How does the cost of thermal energy storage compare to other forms of energy storage

How does the cost of thermal energy storage compare to other forms of energy storage

The cost of thermal energy storage (TES) compares favorably to other energy storage technologies, particularly for long-duration applications:

  • According to a BloombergNEF report, fully installed global average capital expenditure (capex) costs are approximately $232 per kWh for thermal energy storage, making it cheaper than lithium-ion batteries, which cost about $304 per kWh for four-hour storage duration, and compressed air storage at $293 per kWh. Gravity storage has even higher costs at $643 per kWh.
  • The cost advantage of thermal energy storage is more pronounced for long-duration energy storage (discharge durations longer than eight hours), where TES and compressed air storage are now less expensive than lithium-ion batteries.
  • Cost differences vary by region, with China having significantly lower installed costs for TES due to larger-scale deployment and favorable policies. Outside China, TES costs can be roughly 54% higher than the global average, reflecting earlier commercialization stages in other markets.
  • The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) highlights that particle-based TES technologies using inexpensive materials like silica sand can achieve very low energy storage costs of about $2–$4 per kWh of thermal energy stored, which is much cheaper than lithium-ion batteries. However, TES has lower energy density, making it more suitable for large-scale, long-duration stationary storage rather than mobile or space-constrained applications.
  • Another estimate puts TES costs at around 13.5 cents per kWh thermal for a project with a 10% internal rate of return, corresponding to roughly $350 per kWh capex, though costs can vary between 5 to 10 cents per kWh in optimistic cases.

In summary, thermal energy storage is among the cheapest long-duration energy storage options on a capital cost basis, significantly undercutting lithium-ion batteries especially for discharge durations beyond eight hours. Its low cost and scalability make TES attractive for grid-scale, long-duration storage, despite lower energy density compared to batteries.

Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-does-the-cost-of-thermal-energy-storage-compare-to-other-forms-of-energy-storage/

Like (0)
NenPowerNenPower
Previous January 6, 2025 12:50 am
Next January 6, 2025 1:19 am

相关推荐