How does the cost of thermal energy storage compare to other energy storage technologies

How does the cost of thermal energy storage compare to other energy storage technologies

Thermal energy storage (TES) is one of the most cost-effective long-duration energy storage technologies, especially when compared to other technologies like lithium-ion batteries for discharge durations longer than eight hours. Here’s how its costs compare to other common energy storage technologies:

Cost Comparison

  1. Thermal Energy Storage (TES):
    Cost: The global average capital expenditure (capex) cost for TES is approximately $232 per kilowatt-hour (kWh).
    Notes: Costs can vary significantly based on location, with China offering lower capex costs due to favorable policies and larger project sizes.
  2. Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES):
    Cost: CAES has a global average capex cost of about $293 per kWh.
    Notes: Like TES, CAES costs are higher in non-China markets, typically 68% more.
  3. Lithium-Ion Batteries:
    Cost: For four-hour lithium-ion battery storage, the global average capex cost is around $304 per kWh.
    Notes: Lithium-ion battery costs are expected to continue falling due to economies of scale from electric vehicle demand.
  4. Flow Batteries:
    Cost: Although specific costs are not detailed in recent reports, flow batteries are noted as having higher installed system costs than TES and CAES, particularly outside China.
  5. Gravity Storage:
    Cost: Gravity storage, including technologies like pumped hydro, has the highest average global capex cost at $643 per kWh.

Key Takeaways

  • Thermal Energy Storage is currently the cheapest long-duration energy storage technology, particularly suitable for integrating renewable energy into grids.
  • Compressed Air Storage and Flow Batteries are also viable alternatives, though more expensive than TES.
  • Lithium-Ion Batteries remain competitive but are outpriced by TES for longer duration applications.
  • Costs vary significantly by region, with China generally offering lower prices due to larger-scale projects and supportive policies.

Overall, TES is a cost-effective solution for long-duration energy storage, offering significant advantages over other technologies for applications requiring extended energy discharge times.

Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-does-the-cost-of-thermal-energy-storage-compare-to-other-energy-storage-technologies/

Like (0)
NenPowerNenPower
Previous October 3, 2024 9:23 am
Next October 3, 2024 9:29 am

相关推荐