The cost of sulfur-based solid electrolytes generally reflects several factors including raw material prices and fabrication complexity, which differ from other solid electrolyte materials.
- Sulfur-based solid electrolytes often rely heavily on lithium sulfide (Li2S), which is a major cost driver. For example, Li2S can cost over $650 per kilogram, and many sulfide electrolytes contain at least 30 wt% Li2S, making the raw material cost relatively high.
- Despite the cost of Li2S, sulfur as a cathode material itself in lithium-sulfur batteries is quite inexpensive and earth-abundant compared to traditional metals like cobalt and nickel that are used in conventional cathodes. This provides a significant economic advantage in battery design overall.
- Compared to other solid electrolytes (such as oxides or polymers), sulfide-based electrolytes, including argyrodite-type materials like Li6PS5Cl, are noted for their high ionic conductivity and ease of processing, which can reduce certain manufacturing costs even if raw materials are costly.
- Reviews of various solid electrolyte types indicate that while sulfide electrolytes may have higher raw material costs relative to some oxide electrolytes, their performance benefits and compatibility with high-capacity sulfur cathodes support efforts to optimize cost-effectiveness through scalable synthesis routes.
In summary, sulfur-based solid electrolytes face relatively high raw material costs primarily due to lithium sulfide but remain competitive or potentially cost-effective compared to other solid electrolyte materials when considering overall battery design, performance, and the low cost of sulfur cathodes. Ongoing research targets cost reduction through improved synthesis and material formulations to support commercialization of all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries.
Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-does-the-cost-of-sulfur-based-solid-electrolytes-compare-to-other-materials/
