Material costs play a significant role in determining the overall cost of thermal energy storage (TES) systems. The cost effectiveness of these systems largely depends on the type of storage medium used, the design of the containment structures (such as tanks or silos), and the insulation materials employed.
Impact of Material Costs
- Storage Media: The choice of storage media significantly affects the cost. For instance, molten salt systems are widely used in thermal energy storage due to their high energy density but may require a higher upfront investment compared to other materials. On the other hand, silica sand, used in particle thermal energy storage, is abundant and inexpensive, with costs ranging from $30 to $50 per ton. This makes particle thermal energy storage a cost-effective option for large-scale applications.
- Containment and Insulation: The cost of containment structures like concrete silos and insulation materials also contributes significantly to the overall cost. For example, concrete silos and refractory insulation are relatively inexpensive, contributing to lower capital costs for systems like ENDURING. The design efficiency and cost of materials for insulation and storage vessels can vary widely depending on the specific technology.
- CapEx Impact: The capital expenditure (CapEx) for thermal energy storage can vary based on material costs. Global averages suggest that fully installed thermal energy storage systems have a lower CapEx than lithium-ion batteries for long-duration storage, with costs around $232/kWh. However, non-China markets often face higher costs due to factors like economies of scale and policy environments.
- Operational Efficiency: While material costs are crucial, operational efficiency also influences the cost-effectiveness of thermal energy storage. A high round-trip efficiency means less energy is lost during the storage and retrieval process, potentially reducing operational expenses.
- Scalability: Large-scale thermal energy storage can benefit from economies of scale, reducing the cost per unit of energy stored as the system size increases. This makes thermal energy storage more competitive for long-duration applications compared to other forms of energy storage.
Conclusion
In summary, material costs are a critical factor in determining the overall cost of thermal energy storage systems. By selecting inexpensive yet effective materials and optimizing design and operational efficiencies, these systems can offer a cost-effective solution for long-duration energy storage, especially in comparison to more expensive technologies like lithium-ion batteries.
Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-do-material-costs-impact-the-overall-cost-of-thermal-energy-storage-systems/
