Financial institutions view investing in pumped-storage hydropower (PSH) projects as carrying a set of complex risks tied to both traditional financial factors and emerging environmental considerations.
Key Risk Considerations for Financial Institutions in PSH Projects
- Credit and Market Risks: Like other infrastructure projects, PSH investments are subject to credit risk (the risk of borrower default) and market risk (fluctuations in energy prices and demand), which affect the project’s cash flow stability and repayment capacity.
- Environmental and Transition Risks: PSH projects are exposed to environmental risks associated with climate change and regulatory transitions. Financial institutions recognize that environmental factors—such as changes in public policy, carbon pricing, subsidies for renewables, or physical climate impacts—can indirectly affect the financial viability of PSH projects through their clients and invested assets.
- Operational and Liquidity Risks: Operational complexities in PSH projects, including construction, maintenance, and technological challenges, can lead to delays or cost overruns, increasing financial uncertainty. Liquidity risk can arise if cash flows are intermittent or affected by regulatory changes or market shifts.
- Unique Risks in Renewable Projects: According to insights on renewable energy lending, projects like PSH may present unique risks compared to conventional financing. These include regulatory uncertainty, long development timelines, and evolving technology standards.
- Risk Management Practices: Financial institutions emphasize robust risk assessments that include environmental risk analysis, multi-factor authentication for secure access in financial operations, and fraud mitigation strategies to safeguard investments and loan servicing. Integrating environmental risk into traditional risk frameworks is increasingly recognized as essential to ensure long-term financial stability.
In summary, financial institutions approach PSH project investments with a comprehensive risk framework that encompasses credit, market, operational, environmental, and transition risks. They place particular emphasis on understanding how environmental and climate-related factors transmit into financial risks, requiring enhanced risk assessment methodologies and prudent management practices to mitigate potential impacts on returns and capital stability.
Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-do-financial-institutions-view-the-risks-of-investing-in-psh-projects/
