How do converter-fed synchronous machines compare to traditional synchronous machines in terms of efficiency

How do converter-fed synchronous machines compare to traditional synchronous machines in terms of efficiency

Converter-fed synchronous machines (CFSMs) differ from traditional synchronous machines primarily in their integration with power electronic converters, which has implications for their efficiency and operational flexibility.

Efficiency Comparison

  • Traditional synchronous machines typically operate at a fixed speed directly connected to the grid, optimized for a certain operating point, often achieving high efficiencies due to minimal intermediate power conversion losses.
  • CFSMs incorporate full-scale converters (back-to-back voltage source inverters) that allow variable-speed operation and better adaptability to varying load conditions, such as in pumped storage plants or renewable energy applications.
  • However, the presence of power electronic converters introduces additional losses due to switching, conduction, and harmonic distortions. Achieving high efficiency in CFSMs depends on operating the converter within a full voltage range and managing harmonic currents effectively.
  • Studies on large-scale CFSMs, such as the 85 MVA converter-fed synchronous generator, highlight that while converters enable greater operational flexibility and integration with renewable sources, they also create challenges like harmonic emissions and shaft voltages that can affect losses and overall efficiency.
  • CFSMs are more efficient than fixed-speed machines in applications requiring variable speed and flexible operation, as they can optimize machine speed and torque to the load or energy source profile, reducing mechanical losses and improving system efficiency over a range of conditions.

Summary

Aspect Traditional Synchronous Machines Converter-Fed Synchronous Machines (CFSMs)
Operating Speed Fixed (grid-synchronous) Variable (enabled by power electronics)
Efficiency High at rated condition Slightly lower overall due to converter losses, but higher system efficiency in variable conditions
Flexibility Low (fixed speed, limited control) High (variable speed, power factor, and mode control)
Loss Sources Mainly copper and iron losses Copper/iron losses plus converter switching and harmonic losses
Harmonics and Shaft Voltages Minimal from machine alone Present due to converter switching, requiring mitigation

In conclusion, converter-fed synchronous machines provide enhanced operational flexibility and improved efficiency across a range of speeds and loads, especially valuable for renewable integration and pumped storage. Although their raw machine efficiency may be somewhat reduced due to converter losses and harmonics, the overall system efficiency and functionality often surpass traditional synchronous machines in modern applications.

Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-do-converter-fed-synchronous-machines-compare-to-traditional-synchronous-machines-in-terms-of-efficiency/

Like (0)
NenPowerNenPower
Previous February 2, 2025 4:46 am
Next February 2, 2025 5:31 am

相关推荐