New materials are actively being developed to replace lead in perovskite solar cells due to lead’s toxicity and stability issues. Researchers are focusing on lead-free perovskite materials that are more environmentally friendly and stable, though these alternatives currently show somewhat lower efficiencies compared to lead-based cells.
Key New Materials Being Explored:
- Tin (Sn)-based perovskites: Tin is one of the most researched lead replacements. Tin-based perovskite solar cells (TPSCs) have achieved efficiencies over 10% with advancements such as a two-step deposition method improving film uniformity and stability. Recent work has pushed efficiencies beyond 14% for fullerene-free tin perovskite solar cells, along with improved operational stability.
- Germanium (Ge)-based perovskites: Germanium shows promise as a lead substitute. Studies improving Ge-based perovskite solar cells by adding graphene interface layers have shown reduced charge recombination and enhanced performance, though more research is needed to reach higher efficiencies.
- Antimony (Sb) and Bismuth (Bi)-based double perovskites: These metals are explored for their non-toxic nature. Double perovskites combining Sb and Bi offer potentially better stability and environmental profiles. Numerical and experimental work examines these materials in solar devices, but their efficiencies still lag behind lead counterparts.
- Copper-based perovskites: Research employing cerium-doped TiO2 nanoparticles to enhance electron transport in copper-based perovskite solar cells indicates ongoing efforts to diversify alternative cations beyond Sn, Ge, Sb, and Bi.
Challenges and Outlook:
- Lead-free perovskites have so far achieved maximum power conversion efficiencies around 15%, less than the ~25% seen in lead-based cells, indicating significant challenges.
- Major hurdles include structural instability, poor carrier transport due to lower dimensionality, and rapid nonradiative recombination processes that reduce device efficiency.
- Strategies such as dimensionality modulation of material structures, solvent-crystallization regulation in film deposition, and interface engineering are key to improving these lead-free materials.
Summary Table of Lead Substitutes:
| Material | Advantages | Challenges | Efficiency (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tin (Sn) | Similar electronic properties to Pb, better environmental profile | Oxidation instability, film inhomogeneity | >14% (recent advances) |
| Germanium (Ge) | Non-toxic, potential for improved stability with graphene layers | Lower efficiency, less mature technology | Under development |
| Antimony (Sb) & Bismuth (Bi) Double Perovskites | Stable, non-toxic alternatives | Lower carrier mobility and efficiency | <15% |
| Copper-based | Alternative with potential for better electron transport | Developmental stage, materials challenges | Experimental |
In conclusion, multiple lead-free perovskite materials such as tin, germanium, antimony, bismuth, and copper-based compounds are being actively developed and show promise as replacements for lead in perovskite solar cells. While they currently exhibit lower efficiencies and face stability challenges, ongoing research into material engineering and device fabrication methods is steadily improving their performance and may soon enable viable commercial alternatives to toxic lead-based perovskites.
Original article by NenPower, If reposted, please credit the source: https://nenpower.com/blog/are-there-any-new-materials-being-developed-to-replace-lead-in-perovskite-solar-cells/
